The Enigma of Air India 171: A Black Box Analysis
On a fateful flight, Air India 171 experienced a chilling moment captured by its black box at timestamp +00:18. The co-pilot’s rapid breathing into the microphone, followed by a haunting whisper of “it’s slipping,” preceded a catastrophic event: both engines shut down mid-climb just four seconds later. This article delves into the details of this incident, exploring the technical, human, and systemic factors that may have contributed to this aviation mystery, while piecing together insights from available data, aviation protocols, and expert analyses.
The Incident: A Timeline of Events

The black box, comprising the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR), is a critical tool in reconstructing aviation incidents. At +00:18, the CVR captured the co-pilot’s rapid breathing, an audible sign of distress or intense focus. The phrase “it’s slipping” suggests a critical malfunction or loss of control, though its exact meaning remains ambiguous without further context. Four seconds later, the FDR likely recorded the abrupt shutdown of both engines, a rare and catastrophic failure during the climb phase, one of the most demanding segments of flight.
The climb phase, occurring shortly after takeoff, requires high engine thrust and precise coordination between pilots and systems. An engine shutdown during this phase is highly unusual, as modern aircraft like those operated by Air India are equipped with redundant systems to prevent such failures. The sequence of events—rapid breathing, a cryptic whisper, and dual engine failure—points to a complex interplay of mechanical, environmental, or human factors.
Technical Analysis: What Could Cause Dual Engine Failure?
Dual engine failure in modern commercial aircraft is exceedingly rare due to the robustness of jet engines and rigorous maintenance protocols. Several potential causes could explain the shutdown:
Fuel Contamination or Starvation: Contaminated fuel or a disruption in fuel supply could cause both engines to fail simultaneously. For instance, water or debris in the fuel system might clog filters, starving the engines of necessary fuel. However, Air India’s maintenance standards, aligned with international regulations, make this less likely unless a specific oversight occurred.
Bird Strike or Foreign Object Damage: A bird strike during climb could damage both engines, though this is rare for twin-engine aircraft where engines are typically spaced apart. The black box data would need to show evidence of impact or sudden performance degradation.
Electronic or Software Failure: Modern aircraft rely on complex electronic control systems, such as Full Authority Digital Engine Controls (FADEC). A glitch in the FADEC system could theoretically command an erroneous shutdown, though such systems are designed with multiple fail-safes.

Pilot or System Error: The co-pilot’s phrase “it’s slipping” could indicate a misinterpretation of cockpit instruments or an incorrect input into the flight management system. For example, an erroneous throttle adjustment or misconfiguration during climb could lead to an unexpected engine response.
Without specific FDR data, such as engine parameters (N1, N2, fuel flow, or exhaust gas temperature), pinpointing the exact cause remains speculative. However, the rapid sequence of events suggests a sudden and overwhelming issue that the crew had little time to address.
Human Factors: The Co-Pilot’s Role and Response
The co-pilot’s rapid breathing and whispered comment provide critical insight into the human element of this incident. Rapid breathing could indicate acute stress, oxygen deprivation, or intense concentration in response to an unfolding emergency. The phrase “it’s slipping” is particularly intriguing, as it could refer to:
Control Loss: A physical or perceived loss of aircraft control, such as difficulty maintaining pitch or yaw during climb.
System Malfunction: A slipping parameter, such as engine thrust, airspeed, or altitude, observed on cockpit instruments.
Psychological State: A metaphorical expression of the co-pilot’s realization that the situation was deteriorating rapidly.
Cockpit resource management (CRM) emphasizes clear communication between pilots, especially during high-stress situations. The co-pilot’s whisper, rather than a clear announcement, might suggest a moment of panic or confusion, potentially hindering effective coordination with the captain. Training for such scenarios typically involves simulating engine failures, but a dual engine shutdown during climb would test even the most experienced crews.
Systemic Factors: Air India’s Safety Record and Industry Standards

Air India, as a major international carrier, operates under strict oversight from the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) in India and adheres to International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards. However, historical incidents, such as Air India Express Flight 812 in 2010, have raised questions about training, maintenance, and operational protocols. While Air India has since improved its safety record, the incident with Flight 171 underscores the need for continuous vigilance.
Aviation safety relies on a multi-layered approach: robust maintenance, rigorous pilot training, and advanced technology. The black box data from Flight 171 will be critical in determining whether this incident resulted from a rare mechanical failure, human error, or an external factor like weather or air traffic control issues. The investigation will likely involve:
Maintenance Records: Reviewing the aircraft’s maintenance history for any overlooked issues in the engines or fuel systems.
Crew Training: Assessing whether the pilots were adequately prepared for rare scenarios like dual engine failure.
Environmental Factors: Examining weather conditions, such as turbulence or icing, that could affect engine performance.
The Black Box: A Window into the Crisis
The black box is the cornerstone of aviation incident investigations. The CVR captures not only dialogue but also ambient sounds, such as alarms, engine noises, or the co-pilot’s breathing. The FDR records hundreds of parameters, including airspeed, altitude, engine thrust, and control inputs. Together, these devices provide a comprehensive picture of the final moments before the engines shut down.
The co-pilot’s rapid breathing, lasting mere seconds before the whisper, suggests a rapidly escalating situation. The four-second gap between the whisper and engine shutdown indicates a near-instantaneous failure, leaving little time for the crew to react. Investigators will likely focus on:
Audio Analysis: Deciphering background noises on the CVR, such as engine sounds or cockpit alarms, to identify the nature of the emergency.
Flight Data Correlation: Matching the FDR data with the CVR timeline to pinpoint the exact moment of failure and the crew’s response.
Crew Interaction: Analyzing the captain’s response (if any) to the co-pilot’s actions, as the CVR may reveal whether the captain was aware of the issue.
Broader Implications for Aviation Safety
The Air India 171 incident, while specific in its details, highlights broader challenges in aviation safety. Dual engine failure is a nightmare scenario, but modern aircraft are designed to glide safely even without power, allowing pilots to attempt an emergency landing. The success of such maneuvers depends on altitude, proximity to an airport, and crew training—factors that will be scrutinized in the investigation.
This incident also underscores the importance of psychological resilience in pilots. The co-pilot’s rapid breathing suggests a high-stress environment, which can impair decision-making. Airlines invest heavily in simulator training to prepare crews for emergencies, but real-world scenarios often introduce unpredictable variables. Enhancing CRM and stress management training could mitigate similar incidents in the future.
Conclusion: Unraveling the Mystery
The black box timestamp at +00:18 on Air India 171 encapsulates a moment of crisis: rapid breathing, a whispered warning, and the sudden silence of both engines. While the exact cause remains under investigation, the incident serves as a sobering reminder of the complexities of modern aviation. Whether the fault lies in mechanical failure, human error, or an external factor, the lessons learned from Flight 171 will shape future safety protocols.
Aviation remains one of the safest modes of transport, thanks to rigorous standards and continuous improvement. However, incidents like this highlight the need for unrelenting focus on maintenance, training, and technology. As investigators pore over the black box data, the industry awaits answers that will prevent such a mystery from recurring.