For a long time, “The Price Is Right” has offered new automobile rewards. It’s possible that the program fell short of expectations in this instance.
New cars are among the most alluring rewards seen in daytime game shows. As a kind of advertisement, manufacturers have been using game shows to auction off their newest models for decades. This custom on “The Price Is Right” began at least in 1972 when a fortunate competitor took home a Chevy Vega.
But not every winner of a car gets to take home their ideal vehicle. Puyallup, Washington resident Donna Tillman won a brand-new Pontiac GTO on the program in the middle of the 2000s. Regretfully, the vehicle fell short of her expectations.
What went wrong with the purportedly brand-new automobile from “The Price Is Right”?
Tillman won a vehicle on “The Price Is Right” on June 28, 2004. She drove away with a $33,495 2004 Pontiac GTO. She brought the automobile in for servicing after a fender-bender after driving it for a few months. She supposedly found out then that her GTO had significant damage. She said that the frame was impacted since it was so bad. It also seemed like the damage had been covered up and fixed.
“Underlying it was rebuilt to appear like a brand-new car, but it wasn’t,” a Tillman law office representative told Reuters. “That she did not receive a new car is evident.”
Tillman sued CBS, the dealership that supplied the vehicle, and the shipping firm in December 2007. The lawsuit requested specific damages and alleged carelessness and contract violations.
Tillman was given a brand-new vehicle, according to Tom George, the owner of Thorson Motor Center, the Pontiac dealership that supplied the vehicle, who spoke with Reuters. “It’s not listed as being in a wreck,” he said. She only complained about prior damage, he said, after she had crashed the automobile.
Public documents indicate The following year, Tillman filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court. Although the former game show participant’s plea to have her lawsuit dismissed is not explained in the records, the matter was closed by a court in 2008.