FINAL REVELATION: Body Camera Footage from André Silva Reveals Mysterious Object Crossing Road Before Fatal Crash
In a stunning development in the investigation into the tragic car crash that claimed the lives of Liverpool football star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva on July 3, 2025, new reports have emerged claiming that André Silva was wearing a body camera during their ill-fated road trip. According to posts circulating on X, the footage allegedly captures an unidentified object or animal crossing the A-52 motorway in Zamora, Spain, mere seconds before the crash that caused their Lamborghini to veer off the road and burst into flames. This revelation has reignited public interest in the case, raising questions about the cause of the accident and adding a new layer of intrigue to an already complex investigation.
The Crash and Initial Findings
The fatal accident occurred in the early hours of July 3, 2025, on the A-52 motorway near Cernadilla, Zamora, a rural stretch of road known as the Rias Bajas highway. Diogo Jota, 28, and his brother André Silva, 25, a professional footballer for FC Penafiel, were traveling from Portugal to Santander to catch a ferry to the UK, where Jota was due to resume pre-season training with Liverpool. Spanish authorities have stated that the crash was likely caused by a tire blowout while the vehicle was overtaking another car, with evidence suggesting Jota was driving at excessive speed. The Lamborghini veered off the road, struck the central reservation, and caught fire, leaving both brothers dead at the scene.
The investigation, led by Spain’s Guardia Civil, has focused on forensic evidence, including tire marks and vehicle data, to determine the exact circumstances of the crash. Initial reports indicated that the car’s rear tire suffered a puncture, causing it to skid off the road. However, the road’s poor condition, including potholes and uneven surfaces, has also been cited as a potential contributing factor. Despite these findings, the emergence of alleged body camera footage worn by André Silva introduces a new variable that could challenge or complement the existing narrative.
The Body Camera Footage
According to unverified posts on X, André Silva was wearing a body camera during the journey, possibly to document their road trip or for personal use. The footage, which has not been publicly released or officially confirmed by authorities, reportedly shows an unidentified object or animal crossing the road seconds before the crash. Speculation on social media suggests this could have been a deer, wild boar, or another obstacle that prompted a sudden maneuver, potentially contributing to the tire blowout or loss of control.
While no official statement from the Guardia Civil or the Jota family has corroborated these claims, the possibility of such footage has sparked widespread discussion. If authentic, the video could provide critical evidence about the moments leading up to the crash, offering insights into whether an external factor, such as an animal, played a role. However, the lack of publicly available footage and the reliance on social media reports raise concerns about authenticity, especially given prior instances of misinformation. For example, Full Fact debunked claims of unrelated crash footage being shared as Jota’s accident, highlighting the need for caution with unverified videos.
Implications for the Investigation

The alleged body camera footage could have significant implications for the ongoing investigation. Spanish police have stated that their expert report, which includes analysis of tire marks and vehicle data, is nearing completion and will be submitted to the court in Puebla de Sanabria. If the footage exists and is deemed admissible, it could offer a firsthand perspective on the crash, potentially clarifying whether an object on the road contributed to the accident or if the tire blowout and high speed were the sole causes.
Lorry drivers who witnessed the crash have disputed police claims of excessive speed, describing Jota and Silva as driving “calmly” and noting the poor condition of the A-52 highway. The body camera footage could either support or contradict these testimonies, shedding light on the vehicle’s speed and the road conditions at the time. Additionally, it could address lingering questions about why the car caught fire so quickly, a factor that made survival impossible.
Public and Media Reaction
The revelation of potential body camera footage has fueled intense speculation on X and other platforms, with users divided on its significance. Some argue that the footage could exonerate Jota from claims of reckless driving, suggesting that an unavoidable obstacle caused the crash. Others caution against jumping to conclusions, pointing to the history of false footage circulating online. One X post, for instance, referenced a “new angle” of the crash but was flagged as potentially misleading.
The football community, still mourning the loss of Jota and Silva, has expressed a mix of hope and skepticism. Fans hope the footage could provide closure by clarifying the cause of the tragedy, while others worry it may intensify scrutiny on the family, particularly Rute Cardoso, Jota’s widow, who has already faced controversy over deleting voicemails from Jota’s phone. Liverpool FC, which postponed its pre-season training and is considering retiring Jota’s number 20 shirt, has not commented on the footage but continues to support the family.
Ethical and Privacy Considerations
The potential existence of body camera footage raises ethical questions about privacy and the handling of sensitive material. If the footage is real, it may contain distressing images of the moments before the crash, potentially involving Jota and Silva’s final interactions. Releasing such footage to the public could exacerbate the family’s grief, particularly for Cardoso, who identified the brothers’ remains and is raising their three young children—Dinis (born 2021), Duarte (born 2023), and a daughter born in 2024.
The Athletic has previously criticized the rapid spread of crash site photos, arguing they should remain private for investigators and emergency workers. Similar concerns apply to the body camera footage, which, if leaked, could fuel voyeuristic interest rather than serve the investigation. The Jota family’s request for privacy, echoed by Liverpool FC, underscores the need for sensitivity in handling such evidence.
Moving Forward
As the investigation progresses, the Guardia Civil is expected to provide an update on their findings, which may address the body camera footage if it has been submitted as evidence. For now, the claims remain speculative, reliant on unverified social media posts. If confirmed, the footage could shift the narrative around the crash, potentially highlighting external factors like road conditions or wildlife rather than solely driver error.
The tragedy continues to resonate deeply, with tributes at Anfield, Gondomar, and beyond honoring Jota’s 65 goals in 182 appearances for Liverpool and Silva’s contributions to FC Penafiel. The Portuguese Football Federation and UEFA have pledged to commemorate the brothers, with moments of silence observed at matches. As the football world awaits further clarity, the focus remains on supporting the Jota family and preserving the legacy of two young men whose lives were cut short.