Leaked Audio Reveals Tensions at Countess of Chester Hospital Before Lucy Letby’s Arrest
In a shocking revelation, a leaked audio recording from a meeting at the Countess of Chester Hospital has surfaced, shedding new light on the events leading up to the arrest of neonatal nurse Lucy Letby, who was convicted of murdering seven infants and attempting to murder seven others between June 2015 and June 2016. The recording, obtained from a meeting held months before Letby’s arrest in July 2018, captures a tense exchange between a senior doctor and a hospital manager. In the audio, the doctor, identified as neonatal clinical lead consultant Dr. Stephen Brearey, urgently demands Letby’s removal from clinical duties due to mounting suspicions about her involvement in the unexpected deaths and collapses of infants in the neonatal unit. The manager’s response—a quiet, four-word reply—has sparked widespread discussion and raises critical questions about the hospital’s handling of the crisis.

Background of the Lucy Letby Case
Lucy Letby, a 34-year-old nurse from Hereford, was employed at the Countess of Chester Hospital’s neonatal unit from 2012 until her removal from clinical duties in July 2016. During her tenure, the unit experienced an alarming increase in infant mortality and non-fatal collapses, which were later linked to Letby’s actions. She was convicted in August 2023 of seven counts of murder and seven counts of attempted murder, receiving 15 whole-life orders, making her one of the UK’s most notorious serial killers. The Thirlwall Inquiry, launched to investigate the circumstances surrounding her crimes, has revealed systemic failures in the hospital’s response to early warnings from medical staff.
The leaked audio, recently obtained by investigative journalists, originates from a critical meeting in June 2016, following the deaths of two triplet brothers, referred to as Child O and Child P, on consecutive days. These deaths marked a tipping point for consultants who had grown increasingly concerned about Letby’s presence during multiple unexplained incidents.
The Leaked Audio: A Doctor’s Plea and a Manager’s Response
In the audio, Dr. Brearey is heard addressing Karen Rees, the duty executive in urgent care at the time. His voice is firm yet measured, reflecting the gravity of the situation. “I explained what had happened,” Brearey recounts in later testimony, “and I didn’t want Nurse Letby to come back to work the following day or until this was investigated properly.” He emphasized that he and his consultant colleagues were “not happy” with Letby continuing to work in the neonatal unit, citing her consistent presence during a series of infant deaths and collapses that lacked clear medical explanations.

Rees’s response, captured in the audio, is a quiet but resolute four-word statement: “There is no evidence.” This reply, never publicly broadcast until now, has ignited debate about the hospital’s initial refusal to act decisively. Brearey, in the recording, presses further, asking if Rees was willing to take responsibility for any further incidents should Letby remain on duty. According to Brearey’s later testimony at Manchester Crown Court, Rees confirmed she was “happy to take that responsibility.” The following day, another infant, Child Q, nearly died in an incident prosecutors later alleged was an attempted murder by Letby, who is accused of injecting air into the baby’s bloodstream.
Context of the Meeting
The June 2016 meeting occurred at a time when concerns about Letby had been simmering for over a year. As early as June 2015, Dr. Brearey and neonatal unit manager Eirian Powell had conducted an informal review after three infant deaths and one collapse in a single month—an anomaly for a unit that typically saw only two or three deaths annually. Their review identified Letby as the only staff member present during all incidents, though they initially considered this a possible coincidence due to her frequent extra shifts. Despite these early red flags, hospital management resisted taking action, citing a lack of concrete evidence.

By February 2016, another consultant, Dr. Ravi Jayaram, reported witnessing Letby standing idly by as a baby struggled to breathe, further escalating suspicions. Brearey’s repeated attempts to raise the issue with senior management, including emails to Powell and director of nursing Alison Kelly, were met with delays. The leaked audio captures the culmination of these frustrations, as Brearey’s demand for Letby’s immediate removal was rebuffed.
Implications of the Manager’s Response
Rees’s four-word reply, “There is no evidence,” encapsulates the hospital’s cautious stance, which critics argue prioritized reputation over patient safety. The Thirlwall Inquiry has revealed that hospital executives, including former chief executive Tony Chambers and medical director Ian Harvey, were reluctant to involve the police, fearing reputational damage. Instead, they commissioned external reviews by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and consultant neonatologist Dr. Jane Hawdon, which recommended further investigation but were not acted upon promptly.
The leaked audio underscores a critical missed opportunity to intervene before additional harm occurred. After the meeting, Letby worked three more shifts before being removed from the neonatal unit in early July 2016. Suspicious deaths and collapses ceased following her transfer to a clerical role in the hospital’s risk and patient safety office—a move that, disturbingly, gave her access to sensitive patient records.
Broader Systemic Failures
The audio highlights broader systemic issues within the NHS, as detailed in the Thirlwall Inquiry. Dr. Brearey has publicly called for greater accountability for hospital managers, noting that clinicians face regulatory oversight, while executives often do not. He described how raising concerns led to consultants being pressured to apologize to Letby in January 2017, after her grievance against her removal was upheld. This apology, ordered by Chambers, was based on two reviews that appeared to clear Letby, though they recommended further forensic investigation—advice the hospital ignored until May 2017, when Cheshire Police were finally contacted.
The inquiry has also revealed that a senior nurse, Annemarie Lawrence, expressed concerns about Letby’s access to patient records after her removal, warning that she knew about clinical incidents before they were officially reported. This suggests a failure to fully isolate Letby from sensitive information, even after suspicions were raised.
Public and Expert Reactions

The release of the audio has reignited public outrage and prompted renewed scrutiny of the Countess of Chester Hospital’s leadership. Families of Letby’s victims, including the mother of Child C, have condemned the hospital’s handling of the case, with some labeling former executives like Ian Harvey an “absolute disgrace” for downplaying concerns. The GP mother of Child C told the inquiry she felt “betrayed” by the hospital’s lack of transparency, learning about the investigation only through a local newspaper.
Some clinicians and statisticians have questioned the strength of the evidence against Letby, as reported by The Guardian, citing potential statistical misinterpretations and the complexity of medical diagnoses like air embolism. However, the overwhelming consensus from Letby’s trials and the inquiry is that her actions were deliberate, supported by evidence such as abnormal blood test results, medical record inconsistencies, and her own handwritten notes.
Conclusion
The leaked audio from the June 2016 meeting at the Countess of Chester Hospital is a chilling reminder of the missed opportunities to stop Lucy Letby before her crimes escalated. Dr. Brearey’s urgent plea and Karen Rees’s dismissive four-word response—“There is no evidence”—reflect a critical failure in leadership and accountability. As the Thirlwall Inquiry continues, expected to conclude by late 2025, it aims to uncover how such a tragedy was allowed to unfold over a year. The audio, now public, serves as a stark call for systemic reform within the NHS to ensure that whistleblowers are heard, and patient safety is prioritized above institutional reputation. For the families of Letby’s victims, it is a painful echo of a system that failed to protect their children.
Sources: The Guardian, BBC News, Daily Mail, The Independent, Thirlwall Inquiry testimonies