“THE SILENCE BEFORE THE INCIDENT” — WHAT WASN’T SEEN OR HEARD
Friends and neighbors say nothing seemed unusual before the tragic event. Yet investigators believe subtle signs may have been missed, and that certain moments leading up to the inciden@ could have provided crucial insight.
Sometimes the quietest moments speak the loudest — and in this case, they remain largely unexplained.
👇 Full breakdown of the early timeline is in the comments.
“The Silence Before the Incident”: What Wasn’t Seen or Heard in DJ Warras’ Final Morning
On the morning of December 16, 2025, nothing appeared out of the ordinary to those who knew Warrick “DJ Warras” Stock. Friends, colleagues, and neighbors later recounted a typical day: the charismatic 40-year-old media personality was active online, engaging with posts as usual. His final social media activity included reacting to videos about gun violence—posts now viewed with tragic irony. Yet beneath this calm routine, investigators believe subtle signs may have been overlooked: communications, movements, or encounters that could reveal how the assassins knew his exact whereabouts that fateful midday.
news24.com
thestar.co.za
Warras arrived in Johannesburg’s CBD around midday, parking near Zambesi House on Von Wielligh Street—a contested eight-storey building his security firm, Imperium Ops, had been auditing and securing since July 2025. He had discovered alleged illegal activities there, including brothels and possible drug manufacturing, leading to threats against him and his team. Just days earlier, on December 12, he secured protection orders against several occupants.
tiktok.com
Zambezi House Johannesburg | TikTok
Friends say Warras showed no overt signs of distress that morning. He was his energetic self, focused on work—installing biometric systems and reclaiming the property from hijackers. No unusual calls or messages were flagged immediately by loved ones. Neighbors in the busy CBD recalled the area as routinely chaotic, with nothing standing out before the shots rang out.
CCTV footage tells a different story in the minutes prior: Three suspects are seen “colluding” nearby, waiting. One wore a navy-blue security uniform—possibly a disguise. They approached shortly after Warras exited the building. How did they anticipate his arrival? Was he lured via a call or message? Investigators are scrutinizing his phone records and digital footprint for unseen communications. Early theories include a tip-off from inside Zambesi House or surveillance in the preceding hours.
citizen.co.za
citizen.co.za
These quiet moments—the drive into the city, any stops en route, interactions at the site—remain largely unexplained. Witnesses heard nothing suspicious beforehand; the attack was sudden and brazen. Sometimes, as one investigator noted, the absence of alarm is the clue: no frantic alerts from Warras suggests he felt safe until the final seconds.
The family, still processing grief for a devoted father of three, honors his anti-crime legacy while urging deeper probes into these gaps. As the case against suspect Victor Mthethwa Majola resumes tomorrow, January 6, 2026—where bail will be contested—police continue hunting the dreadlocked shooter and accomplices.
facebook.com
facebook.com
In Johannesburg’s violent struggle over hijacked buildings, these unseen preludes underscore the risks Warras faced daily. The quietest moments often speak loudest in hindsight—hinting at betrayal, planning, or missed warnings. Until fully reconstructed, they haunt the timeline, reminding us how ordinary days can end in tragedy.
Justice for Warras demands illuminating what wasn’t seen or heard that morning.
