Following the high-profile Texas trial where 19-year-old Karmelo Anthony was convicted of murder and sentenced to 35 years in prison for the fatal track meet stabbing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf, his parents have broken their silence. Sitting down for an interview with Mimi Brown on The Breakfast Club, Andrew Anthony and Kala Hayes expressed deep anger and confusion over the swift, unanimous verdict handed down by the Collin County jury.

Describing their current life as a living nightmare, the parents directed sharp criticism toward the court, the jury, and the witness testimony that ultimately put their son behind bars. They heavily implied that they are the ones suffering an injustice, with Andrew Anthony stating that Karmelo did everything by the law. His mother openly accused the jury of bias, claiming their minds were made up before the trial even commenced.

Allegations of Lying on the Stand

The core of the parents’ grievance rests on the student testimony that defined the trial. The deadly confrontation occurred inside a pop-up team tent during a downpour, beginning when Metcalf told Anthony to leave his school’s designated area. While prosecutors successfully argued that Anthony pulled a pocketknife from his bag and used lethal force against an unarmed push, Andrew Anthony strongly pushed back on how those moments were described.

He explicitly accused key prosecution witnesses of lying about the sequence of events and taunting behavior to destroy his son’s claim of self-defense. Furthermore, the parents used the interview to challenge specific, emotional narratives presented by the state—such as the widely reported detail that Metcalf died in the arms of his twin brother, Hunter—labeling it an engineered story meant to sway public opinion rather than an objective fact.

Shift to a Public Defender and Indigency Claim

The most shocking twist in their post-verdict legal strategy centers on who will represent Karmelo Anthony moving forward, a detail that sharply contradicts standard expectations for high-profile legal battles. During the interview, Andrew Anthony voiced severe regret over their initial legal strategy, explicitly stating he regretted hiring a white private defense attorney and expressing remorse for ignoring warnings from community members who advised him against it.

However, despite hints at wanting a new, specialized legal direction to handle the newly filed appeal, the family’s formal court filings reveal a different reality. Rather than naming a high-priced, controversial civil rights attorney or an elite private appellate specialist, court records show that Karmelo Anthony filed a notice of indigency.

By declaring that he no longer has the financial means to fund a private legal defense, Anthony has officially requested that the state provide him with a court-appointed public defender to handle his appellate case. This move shifts the burden of his legal fight back to state-funded counsel, even as his parents continue to aggressively campaign in the media to overturn the conviction.