HBO Stands By JK Rowling Ahead of Harry Potter TV Series Involvement, Says Author “Has the Right to Express Her Personal Views”

Harry Potter and Gilderoy Lockhart

HBO issued a statement in support of JK Rowling and her Harry Potter TV series involvement, noting that the author “has the right to express her personal views” in the face of fan backlash.

Rowling, the author of one of the most successful books series of all time, has become a lightning rod of controversy in recent years with former fans and even some of the actors from her Harry Potter films speaking out against her. This mostly centers around Rowling’s views on individuals who identify with a gender that differs from their natural biology. She additionally believes that anatomical men should not be permitted in women’s spaces or sports.

Author J.K. Rowling reads from Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone at the Easter Egg Roll at White House. Screenshot taken from official White House video. Photo Credit: Executive Office of the President, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

This has displeased many in Hollywood, with calls for boycotts of Rowling’s work ringing out every few months. However, the Harry Potter IP has never been stronger, with books, movies, theme park lands and attractions, endless merchandise, a hit video game, and now an upcoming long-form TV series on HBO and the Max streaming service.

Rowling is set to be heavily involved in the TV series, which will adapt her original seven books and flesh them out in a way that was never possible in the Daniel Radcliffe-led films.

Of course, any involvement by Rowling is often met with loud opposition from those who disagree with her personal views.

 

When the video game Hogwarts Legacy came out in early 2023, activists decried the title and even went as far as to threaten and harass streamers who played and supported the game.

And this was a title Rowling had virtually no involvement in.
Hogwarts Legacy Harry Potter game scene

A screenshot from Hogwarts Legacy (2023), Avalanche Software

However, despite the mass calls of protest, a very valuable lesson was learned from the Hogwarts Legacy controversy.

Most people don’t care.

Hogwarts Legacy was a massive success, selling 30 million copies and generating more than $1 billion in revenue. It represented some of the fiercest and loudest attacks ever flung at Rowling’s work by online activists and it didn’t make a shred of difference.

That might be why after years of dancing around the controversy, Warner Bros. has finally chosen a side. And it’s not going to sit well with the Hollywood elite.

HBO boss Casey Bloys spoke about Rowling’s involvement in the series at a press event and said that the author was, “very, very involved in the process selecting the writer and the director.”
Voldemort smiling

Ralph Fiennes as Lord Voldemort in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 (2010), Warner Bros. Pictures

He also definitively stated that her personal feelings on protecting women’s spaces, “haven’t affected the casting or hiring of writers or productions staff.”

Representatives from HBO and Warner Bros. told Variety in a statement that Rowling’s contributions to adaptations of her beloved work has been “invaluable” over the last twenty years.

“We are proud to once again tell the story of Harry Potter — the heartwarming books that speak to power of friendship, resolve and acceptance,” the statement said. “J.K. Rowling has a right to express her personal views. We will remain focused on the development of the new series, which will only benefit from her involvement.”

That’s a definitive statement from HBO and by extension Warner Bros. Discovery in support of Rowling that flies in the face of the activist noise already rising up on social media platforms.

But Rowling doesn’t take abuse and venom from online trolls laying down. The author is a fun follow on X, where she routinely jousts with those who express their anger toward her.

 

When JK Rowling was asked recently about the Harry Potter series and her involvement in it, she responded by simply stating that she’s, “very involved,” and expressed optimism about the project. When someone quoted that post talking about their “immeasurable disappointment” at the creator of an IP being involved in a major adaptation of their work, Rowling responded as only she can.

“I’ve only just seen this response to me saying I’m very involved in the Harry Potter TV show,” she said. “And I think I’ve pulled something laughing.”
JK Rowling talking

J.K. Rowling via The Rowling Library YouTube

As should come as no shock, the legacy access media has already started to attack HBO and Rowling. Variety ran a hit piece just today trying to paint the author as some kind of monster.

“The industry has never quite faced a scenario in which the sole creator of a beloved, multibillion-dollar global franchise has plunged so unabashedly into one of the culture’s most contentious social issues,” writer Adam B. Vary opined. “She’s effectively made herself toxic to many within the core fandom, whose devotion began 25 years ago when they were children and has sustained the franchise long after the books and the film series concluded.”
Harry Potter played by Daniel Radcliffe

Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 (2010), Warner Bros. Pictures

READ: James Gunn Claims ‘Peacemaker’ is Once Again Canon to New DC Cinematic Universe, With One Exception

Variety then goes on to turn its narrative stink-eye toward the actors who will eventually star in the upcoming series, winding up for what will undoubtedly be a plethora of attacks against them for their participation in the beloved franchise.

“For any actor joining the new Harry Potter series, Rowling has thrown down a gauntlet they’re unlikely to escape once casting for the show begins in earnest next year,” Variety said.

“You can’t fault somebody for wanting to do the job,” said Kat Miller, a woman who has made her career glomming off of Rowling’s work. She serves as creative director of MuggleNet and co-author of The Unofficial Harry Potter Companion. “But the internet and the fandom and the politics of it all are probably going to demand that they say something. If you don’t, people are going to automatically assume that you agree with Rowling.”

 

Rowling responded to calls for a boycott back in April of 2023.

“Dreadful news, which I feel duty bound to share,” Rowling said on her official X (Twitter at the time) account. “Activists in my mentions are trying to organize yet another boycott of my work, this time of the Harry Potter TV show. As forewarned is forearmed, I’ve taken the precaution of laying in a large stock of champagne.”

Do you think boycotts of the Harry Potter television series on HBO will work? Are you happy about JK Rowling and her Harry Potter TV series involvement? Sound off and let us know!

Related Posts

Our Privacy policy

https://news75today.com - © 2024 News75today